eAccountable vs Mabo

A head-to-head comparison of eAccountable and Mabo in ppc agencies, scored across the same 5 weighted criteria so you can see exactly where each agency is stronger.

eAccountable

Performance-driven digital marketing agency built to unlock growth.

79/ 100 overallHigher score

Mabo

Performance marketing built around your business.

74/ 100 overall

Score-by-score

Criterion	eAccountable	Mabo
Website Presence(20%)	88	85
Search Visibility(20%)	62	56
Trust & Credibility(20%)	83	78
Market Presence(15%)	76	70
Customer Satisfaction(10%)	89	84
Overall	79	74

Pricing at a glance

eAccountable

Model: Primarily custom-quoted digital marketing engagements, likely structured as ongoing monthly/retainer-style agency services for channels like affiliate, Amazon/marketplaces, paid media, SEO/GEO, email, and related consulting. eAccountable also publicly offers at least one standalone performance-based service: Amazon Revenue Recovery, billed purely as a commission on recovered funds.
Typical range: $5,000-$20,000+ / month

Full eAccountable pricing →

Mabo

Model: Custom-quoted digital marketing engagement, typically an ongoing monthly management/retainer-style partnership for PPC, Paid Social, and/or SEO rather than fixed packages. Mabo explicitly positions itself as flexible and bespoke, with support delivered as standalone services or a wider multi-channel strategy, and emphasizes no fixed-term/long-term contracts.
Typical range: $150-$199 / hr

Full Mabo pricing →

eAccountable profile →Mabo profile →← All ppc agencies