Lilo Social vs Mabo

A head-to-head comparison of Lilo Social and Mabo in ppc agencies, scored across the same 5 weighted criteria so you can see exactly where each agency is stronger.

Lilo Social

The leading full-funnel ecommerce growth agency.

71/ 100 overall

Mabo

Performance marketing built around your business.

74/ 100 overallHigher score

Score-by-score

Criterion	Lilo Social	Mabo
Website Presence(20%)	86	85
Search Visibility(20%)	52	56
Trust & Credibility(20%)	74	78
Market Presence(15%)	71	70
Customer Satisfaction(10%)	70	84
Overall	71	74

Pricing at a glance

Lilo Social

Model: Custom-quoted monthly retainer / ongoing agency engagement for full-funnel ecommerce growth and retention services, with some projects also scoped as larger engagements. The company describes partnerships as "full-funnel engagements" and a careers page references "monthly retainer deliverables," indicating recurring-retainer billing rather than pay-per-lead or pay-per-appointment.
Typical range: $100-$149/hr

Full Lilo Social pricing →

Mabo

Model: Custom-quoted digital marketing engagement, typically an ongoing monthly management/retainer-style partnership for PPC, Paid Social, and/or SEO rather than fixed packages. Mabo explicitly positions itself as flexible and bespoke, with support delivered as standalone services or a wider multi-channel strategy, and emphasizes no fixed-term/long-term contracts.
Typical range: $150-$199 / hr

Full Mabo pricing →

Lilo Social profile →Mabo profile →← All ppc agencies