Ironpaper vs Walker Sands

A head-to-head comparison of Ironpaper and Walker Sands in lead generation agencies, scored across the same 5 weighted criteria so you can see exactly where each agency is stronger.

Ironpaper

B2B growth agency building growth engines for marketing and sales success.

71/ 100 overall

Walker Sands

B2B integrated marketing and PR agency focused on outcome-based marketing.

80/ 100 overallHigher score

Score-by-score

Criterion	Ironpaper	Walker Sands
Website Presence(20%)	87	90
Search Visibility(20%)	52	62
Trust & Credibility(20%)	74	84
Market Presence(15%)	71	80
Customer Satisfaction(10%)	68	88
Overall	71	80

Pricing at a glance

Ironpaper

Model: Custom-quoted B2B marketing engagement, most consistent with an ongoing monthly retainer/agency-partner model for strategy + execution, with some project-based website/design work. Ironpaper repeatedly describes itself as an "agency partner," emphasizes monthly lead goals, weekly iteration, pilot campaigns, and ongoing optimization rather than packaged plans or per-lead / per-appointment pricing.
Typical range: $5,000+ / month

Full Ironpaper pricing →

Walker Sands

Model: Custom-quoted B2B agency engagements, primarily a mix of project-based work and ongoing monthly retainer relationships. Walker Sands presents itself as an outcome-based integrated marketing/PR agency with tailored scopes rather than fixed packages or published plans.
Typical range: $50,000-$199,999 per project

Full Walker Sands pricing →

Ironpaper profile →Walker Sands profile →← All lead generation agencies