Ironpaper vs Transmission

A head-to-head comparison of Ironpaper and Transmission in lead generation agencies, scored across the same 5 weighted criteria so you can see exactly where each agency is stronger.

Ironpaper

B2B growth agency building growth engines for marketing and sales success.

71/ 100 overallHigher score
Transmission

Global B2B marketing agency combining human expertise and AI to make marketing a driver of business growth.

64/ 100 overall

Score-by-score

CriterionIronpaperTransmission
Website Presence(20%)8784
Search Visibility(20%)5252
Trust & Credibility(20%)7472
Market Presence(15%)7176
Customer Satisfaction(10%)6818
Overall7164

Pricing at a glance

Ironpaper

Model
Custom-quoted B2B marketing engagement, most consistent with an ongoing monthly retainer/agency-partner model for strategy + execution, with some project-based website/design work. Ironpaper repeatedly describes itself as an "agency partner," emphasizes monthly lead goals, weekly iteration, pilot campaigns, and ongoing optimization rather than packaged plans or per-lead / per-appointment pricing.
Typical range
$5,000+ / month
Full Ironpaper pricing →

Transmission

Model
Custom-quoted B2B agency engagements, most likely a mix of project-based scopes and ongoing retainer work. Public evidence shows Transmission sells broad strategic and execution services (growth consulting, go-to-market, brand strategy, paid media/performance, demand generation, digital optimization, ABM) rather than fixed packages or published plans.
Typical range
$150-$199 / hr
Full Transmission pricing →