Ironpaper vs New North

A head-to-head comparison of Ironpaper and New North in lead generation agencies, scored across the same 5 weighted criteria so you can see exactly where each agency is stronger.

Ironpaper

B2B growth agency building growth engines for marketing and sales success.

71/ 100 overall

New North

A B2B marketing agency for technology companies.

72/ 100 overallHigher score

Score-by-score

Criterion	Ironpaper	New North
Website Presence(20%)	87	84
Search Visibility(20%)	52	56
Trust & Credibility(20%)	74	78
Market Presence(15%)	71	68
Customer Satisfaction(10%)	68	74
Overall	71	72

Pricing at a glance

Ironpaper

Model: Custom-quoted B2B marketing engagement, most consistent with an ongoing monthly retainer/agency-partner model for strategy + execution, with some project-based website/design work. Ironpaper repeatedly describes itself as an "agency partner," emphasizes monthly lead goals, weekly iteration, pilot campaigns, and ongoing optimization rather than packaged plans or per-lead / per-appointment pricing.
Typical range: $5,000+ / month

Full Ironpaper pricing →

New North

Model: Custom monthly retainer using a points-based pricing system rather than hourly billing. New North’s own site says clients pay one monthly price for access to a strategy + execution team, and Clutch reviews indicate some engagements are ongoing retainers; third-party directories also list hourly and project-size bands.
Typical range: $6,000–$15,000 / month

Full New North pricing →

Ironpaper profile →New North profile →← All lead generation agencies