Inbox Attack vs IronHorse

A head-to-head comparison of Inbox Attack and IronHorse in lead generation agencies, scored across the same 5 weighted criteria so you can see exactly where each agency is stronger.

Inbox Attack

B2B marketing that doesn't hold you hostage.

67/ 100 overallHigher score

IronHorse

B2B growth marketing agency helping companies get discovered and get chosen in the AI era.

61/ 100 overall

Score-by-score

Criterion	Inbox Attack	IronHorse
Website Presence(20%)	74	83
Search Visibility(20%)	38	52
Trust & Credibility(20%)	79	64
Market Presence(15%)	68	68
Customer Satisfaction(10%)	86	18
Overall	67	61

Pricing at a glance

Inbox Attack

Model: Hybrid fixed-fee/project pricing plus monthly retainer options, with a la carte service pricing and paid 1:1 sessions. Specifically: one-off system builds and audits sold at flat fees, channel/package builds sold as fixed-price packages, and an ongoing 3-month managed engagement sold as a monthly retainer. Not performance-based; the site explicitly says they turn down commission-based projects and appointment-setting work.
Typical range: $145-$2,650 per fixed-price service or session

Full Inbox Attack pricing →

IronHorse

Model: Primarily fixed-fee packaged engagements sold as custom B2B demand generation/ABM/partner marketing projects, plus recurring monthly retainers for ongoing paid media management and webinar derivative content. Iron Horse also offers quarterly content packages and scope-based custom programs.
Typical range: $7.5k-$10k/month

Full IronHorse pricing →

Inbox Attack profile →IronHorse profile →← All lead generation agencies