Edit vs Ironpaper

A head-to-head comparison of Edit and Ironpaper in lead generation agencies, scored across the same 5 weighted criteria so you can see exactly where each agency is stronger.

Edit

Engineers of connected customer experiences

71/ 100 overallHigher score

Ironpaper

B2B growth agency building growth engines for marketing and sales success.

71/ 100 overall

Score-by-score

Criterion	Edit	Ironpaper
Website Presence(20%)	86	87
Search Visibility(20%)	62	52
Trust & Credibility(20%)	74	74
Market Presence(15%)	71	71
Customer Satisfaction(10%)	52	68
Overall	71	71

Pricing at a glance

Edit

Model: Custom quote for consulting / implementation work, with public-sector cloud consulting explicitly billed on a time-and-materials day-rate basis. Overall agency engagements appear bespoke rather than packaged self-serve plans.
Typical range: £950–£1,050 / day

Full Edit pricing →

Ironpaper

Model: Custom-quoted B2B marketing engagement, most consistent with an ongoing monthly retainer/agency-partner model for strategy + execution, with some project-based website/design work. Ironpaper repeatedly describes itself as an "agency partner," emphasizes monthly lead goals, weekly iteration, pilot campaigns, and ongoing optimization rather than packaged plans or per-lead / per-appointment pricing.
Typical range: $5,000+ / month

Full Ironpaper pricing →

Edit profile →Ironpaper profile →← All lead generation agencies