Inbox Attack vs Walker Sands

A head-to-head comparison of Inbox Attack and Walker Sands in lead generation agencies, scored across the same 5 weighted criteria so you can see exactly where each agency is stronger.

Inbox Attack

B2B marketing that doesn't hold you hostage.

67/ 100 overall
Walker Sands

B2B integrated marketing and PR agency focused on outcome-based marketing.

80/ 100 overallHigher score

Score-by-score

CriterionInbox AttackWalker Sands
Website Presence(20%)7490
Search Visibility(20%)3862
Trust & Credibility(20%)7984
Market Presence(15%)6880
Customer Satisfaction(10%)8688
Overall6780

Pricing at a glance

Inbox Attack

Model
Hybrid fixed-fee/project pricing plus monthly retainer options, with a la carte service pricing and paid 1:1 sessions. Specifically: one-off system builds and audits sold at flat fees, channel/package builds sold as fixed-price packages, and an ongoing 3-month managed engagement sold as a monthly retainer. Not performance-based; the site explicitly says they turn down commission-based projects and appointment-setting work.
Typical range
$145-$2,650 per fixed-price service or session
Full Inbox Attack pricing →

Walker Sands

Model
Custom-quoted B2B agency engagements, primarily a mix of project-based work and ongoing monthly retainer relationships. Walker Sands presents itself as an outcome-based integrated marketing/PR agency with tailored scopes rather than fixed packages or published plans.
Typical range
$50,000-$199,999 per project
Full Walker Sands pricing →