Inbox Attack vs Transmission

A head-to-head comparison of Inbox Attack and Transmission in lead generation agencies, scored across the same 5 weighted criteria so you can see exactly where each agency is stronger.

Inbox Attack

B2B marketing that doesn't hold you hostage.

67/ 100 overallHigher score
Transmission

Global B2B marketing agency combining human expertise and AI to make marketing a driver of business growth.

64/ 100 overall

Score-by-score

CriterionInbox AttackTransmission
Website Presence(20%)7484
Search Visibility(20%)3852
Trust & Credibility(20%)7972
Market Presence(15%)6876
Customer Satisfaction(10%)8618
Overall6764

Pricing at a glance

Inbox Attack

Model
Hybrid fixed-fee/project pricing plus monthly retainer options, with a la carte service pricing and paid 1:1 sessions. Specifically: one-off system builds and audits sold at flat fees, channel/package builds sold as fixed-price packages, and an ongoing 3-month managed engagement sold as a monthly retainer. Not performance-based; the site explicitly says they turn down commission-based projects and appointment-setting work.
Typical range
$145-$2,650 per fixed-price service or session
Full Inbox Attack pricing →

Transmission

Model
Custom-quoted B2B agency engagements, most likely a mix of project-based scopes and ongoing retainer work. Public evidence shows Transmission sells broad strategic and execution services (growth consulting, go-to-market, brand strategy, paid media/performance, demand generation, digital optimization, ABM) rather than fixed packages or published plans.
Typical range
$150-$199 / hr
Full Transmission pricing →