Inbox Attack vs Ironpaper

A head-to-head comparison of Inbox Attack and Ironpaper in lead generation agencies, scored across the same 5 weighted criteria so you can see exactly where each agency is stronger.

Inbox Attack

B2B marketing that doesn't hold you hostage.

67/ 100 overall

Ironpaper

B2B growth agency building growth engines for marketing and sales success.

71/ 100 overallHigher score

Score-by-score

Criterion	Inbox Attack	Ironpaper
Website Presence(20%)	74	87
Search Visibility(20%)	38	52
Trust & Credibility(20%)	79	74
Market Presence(15%)	68	71
Customer Satisfaction(10%)	86	68
Overall	67	71

Pricing at a glance

Inbox Attack

Model: Hybrid fixed-fee/project pricing plus monthly retainer options, with a la carte service pricing and paid 1:1 sessions. Specifically: one-off system builds and audits sold at flat fees, channel/package builds sold as fixed-price packages, and an ongoing 3-month managed engagement sold as a monthly retainer. Not performance-based; the site explicitly says they turn down commission-based projects and appointment-setting work.
Typical range: $145-$2,650 per fixed-price service or session

Full Inbox Attack pricing →

Ironpaper

Model: Custom-quoted B2B marketing engagement, most consistent with an ongoing monthly retainer/agency-partner model for strategy + execution, with some project-based website/design work. Ironpaper repeatedly describes itself as an "agency partner," emphasizes monthly lead goals, weekly iteration, pilot campaigns, and ongoing optimization rather than packaged plans or per-lead / per-appointment pricing.
Typical range: $5,000+ / month

Full Ironpaper pricing →

Inbox Attack profile →Ironpaper profile →← All lead generation agencies