Flowd vs Ironpaper

A head-to-head comparison of Flowd and Ironpaper in lead generation agencies, scored across the same 5 weighted criteria so you can see exactly where each agency is stronger.

Flowd

AI agent for policy, media, and trend research built on authoritative institutional sources.

44/ 100 overall

Ironpaper

B2B growth agency building growth engines for marketing and sales success.

71/ 100 overallHigher score

Score-by-score

Criterion	Flowd	Ironpaper
Website Presence(20%)	72	87
Search Visibility(20%)	32	52
Trust & Credibility(20%)	48	74
Market Presence(15%)	38	71
Customer Satisfaction(10%)	15	68
Overall	44	71

Pricing at a glance

Flowd

Model: Custom quote for a B2B SaaS research platform, likely sold as a subscription and/or API access rather than published self-serve plans. The product is positioned as an AI-powered policy/media/trend research platform with web and API tools for data collection, analysis, visualization, smart search, policy monitoring, and news/research APIs.

Full Flowd pricing →

Ironpaper

Model: Custom-quoted B2B marketing engagement, most consistent with an ongoing monthly retainer/agency-partner model for strategy + execution, with some project-based website/design work. Ironpaper repeatedly describes itself as an "agency partner," emphasizes monthly lead goals, weekly iteration, pilot campaigns, and ongoing optimization rather than packaged plans or per-lead / per-appointment pricing.
Typical range: $5,000+ / month

Full Ironpaper pricing →

Flowd profile →Ironpaper profile →← All lead generation agencies