Shortlisted provider comparison

Sculpt vs Mabo: shared-service comparison

Mabo is the first provider in Sculpt's focused shortlist, selected for verified shared services. This side-by-side view shows each provider's separate overall evaluation across the same 5 weighted criteria; those scores are not fit scores.

Sculpt

100% focused on leveling up B2B social.

71/ 100 overall
Mabo

Performance marketing built around your business.

74/ 100 overallHigher score

Score-by-score

CriterionSculptMabo
Website Presence(20%)8885
Search Visibility(20%)5256
Trust & Credibility(20%)7478
Market Presence(15%)7270
Customer Satisfaction(10%)6884
Overall7174

Pricing at a glance

Sculpt

Model
Hybrid custom pricing. Sculpt sells primarily on flat monthly retainers for ongoing B2B social media work, with separate project fees for consulting and one-off campaigns. Within retainers, they use a Content Unit-based scoping model for content production, and some services are sold as bounded monthly ranges or single-campaign packages.
Typical range
$2,000-$50,000/mo
Full Sculpt pricing →

Mabo

Model
Custom-quoted digital marketing engagement, typically an ongoing monthly management/retainer-style partnership for PPC, Paid Social, and/or SEO rather than fixed packages. Mabo explicitly positions itself as flexible and bespoke, with support delivered as standalone services or a wider multi-channel strategy, and emphasizes no fixed-term/long-term contracts.
Typical range
$150-$199 / hr
Full Mabo pricing →