SalesAR Reviews & Ratings
See which third-party platforms have a stored listing for SalesAR, which actually report reviews, and what evidence is available. A platform listing alone is not treated as a customer review.
Review coverage at a glance
- Platforms listed
- 3
- With review evidence
- 3
- Reported review total
- 170
“Listed” means the stored research found a platform profile. It does not mean reviews were available. “With review evidence” requires a positive review count or a stored excerpt.
Platform-by-platform evidence
- 4.9/5
Clutch reviews describe SalesAR as strong in outbound lead generation, research, and appointment setting, with frequent praise for responsiveness, structure, and communication. Some Clutch summaries also note mixed recent sentiment and occasional concerns about consistency of results or lead quality.
- Anonymous · Director, CoStraetgix5.0
“We were impressed by their rigorous approach to the foundational research.”
May 28, 2026Read source on Clutch - Anonymous · Founder & Lead Developer, Software Company5.0
“What stood out most about SalesAR was their ability to combine strategic insight with hands-on execution.”
Dec 16, 2025Read source on Clutch - Julia Huizeling · Partner & Business Development Manager, CerQlar4.0
“What impressed us most was SalesAR’s ability to quickly understand our market and dive deep into the research.”
Oct 27, 2025Read source on Clutch
- 4.9/5
G2 reviewers consistently praise SalesAR’s communication, professionalism, and ability to generate qualified leads and meetings. Visible criticisms are limited, but a few reviewers ask for more strategic input or more appointments.
- Zoran P.5.0
“The cooperation with the team has been excellent. We appreciate their professionalism and the smoothness of the workflow.”
12/25/2023Read source on G2 - Alberto G. · Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)5.0
“We value the approach to partnership and communication management.”
7/29/2024Read source on G2 - Emanuela M. · Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)5.0
“The communication and cooperation approach”
7/29/2024Read source on G2 - Verified User in Information Technology and Services5.0
“Efficient lead generation and outreach strategies.”
3/25/2024Read source on G2
- 2.8/5
The visible Trustpilot profile is for salesar.io and currently contains only a few recent 1-star reviews. Those reviewers criticize lead quality, describe the sales pitch as misleading, and say they saw poor return on investment.
- Cassandra Jones1.0
“The remaining leads proved to be either unresponsive, outdated, or not genuinely interested in buying or selling property.”
Apr 18, 2026Read source on Trustpilot - Cassandra Jones1.0
“Based on my experience, I would not recommend SalesArUs to other agents seeking reliable, high-quality leads.”
Apr 18, 2026Read source on Trustpilot - Blake Reaves1.0
“The leads have been horrible. They have been other realtors, people who did not know why I was calling, or investors not looking for a realtor.”
Feb 25, 2026Read source on Trustpilot
- GoogleNo listing found in stored research
- CapterraNo listing found in stored research
- BBBNo listing found in stored research
Themes in the stored analysis
Strengths
- + Strong communication and responsiveness
- + Effective lead generation support
- + Solid research and market understanding
- + Professional project execution
Concerns
- − Poor lead quality
- − Weak ROI or results
- − Needs more strategic input
Sources and data limitations
SalesAR has a clear third-party review presence on Clutch, G2, and Trustpilot, but I could not verify a matching listing for this exact company on Google, Capterra, or BBB from search results. Across the platforms where it is listed, Clutch and G2 skew strongly positive around lead generation, responsiveness, and communication, while Trustpilot currently shows a small but negative set of recent reviews that criticize lead quality and value.
This page reflects stored platform research, not a live platform lookup. It contains 10 stored review excerpts. Platform totals, ratings, and profile availability can change; follow the linked profile or excerpt sources to verify current information. Reviewer verification is not assumed unless a source explicitly establishes it.